Print Friendly and PDF

Loving Father Vital for Kids’ Development

Postmillennialism —  Leave a comment

Christian Institute — A father’s love is just as, if not more, important to a child’s emotional development as its mother’s, a new study has revealed.

Children who did not have a loving father present were more likely to be insecure, hostile and aggressive, researchers said.

According to researchers, children feeling accepted by their fathers was linked to factors such as emotional stability, a positive world view and less hostility.

By contrast feeling rejected by fathers was linked to problems with anger or rejection, emotional instability and feelings of inadequacy.

Professor Ronald Rohner, the study’s co-author, says children suffer when they feel rejected by their parents, with the effect being more marked for those who feel rejected by their fathers.

“In the US, Great Britain and Europe, we have assumed for the past 300 years that all children need for normal healthy development is a loving relationship with their mother,” he added.

“And that dads are there as support for the mother and to support the family financially but are not required for the healthy development of the children.

“But that belief is fundamentally wrong. We have to start getting away from that idea and realise the dad’s influence is as great, and sometimes greater, than the mother’s.”

Norman Wells, of the Family Education Trust, said: “This study underlines the importance of intact and stable families where both the father and the mother are committed to bringing up their children together.

“Successive governments have failed to recognise the fact that men and women are different and that they parent differently.”

Continue Reading on www.christian.org.uk
Print Friendly and PDF

Postmillennialism

Posts

No Comments

Be the first to start the conversation.

Leave a Reply

Text formatting is available via select HTML.

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong> 

*